Express your nature.

Upload, Share, and Be Recognized.

Join with Facebook
or join manually
X
Posted By:Skip
Comments:

Old Comments:

2009-06-26 11:54:15
Yes, it was awful...and I had to force myself to go back several times just to make sure my first impression was correct...after all, we dont want to make any hasty judgements around here.....
2009-06-26 11:23:18
Oooohhh...naughty naughty patito ;-)
2009-06-26 10:20:55
I think they have to flag it quite a few times for it to be removed, so it's probably more than a few people, one time witchgirl, posted a pic that was even more innocent looking and I told her to repost it, and she did and they left it alone the second time. hey patito, you must have been browsing through the 18 plus section for quite awhile..I wrote that comment ages ago!! :)
2009-06-26 09:11:14
Well, Skip..I dragged myself, against my will, kicking and screaming, to the 18+ section, where I forced myself to peruse the photos (oh the horror..the horror ) until I found the one you're talking about..I agree 100%...just a picture of a pretty lady..nothing remotely pornographic about it..but that happens a lot..anything that the most prudish old maid might find the least bit suggestive gets flagged...would be interesting to know who does it and why...my suspicion is that it's done by some ultra-conservative fundamentalist religious nut jobs who lurk around here...ideally, a person would have to identify themselves to flag a photo..
2009-06-26 08:00:00
It's funny that I have to leave a comment here, but I just made a comment on..porcorooso's pic of Irina Shrick, that was removed from the most popular page, and I think it was wrong to remove it, but even the comments on pics in the 18 plus section don't show up here. anyone who cares to read the comment, it's near the top in the 18 plus section.
2009-06-25 16:09:55
Being an albino, he will probably never find a suitable mate, because he will have to compete with all the normally-colored peacocks. Kind of sad, really.