Sign up  

Linking codes:

Direct link:
post to blog/website:
post to forum/bulletin board:

Other cool pics from Pixdaus...



We have 16 comment(s) for this pic:


Makes me think... that he wasted a whole stack of papers to take these pictures? lol
7 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: Auron at 2008-05-06 16:40:02 | reply to this

Makes me think...that pandas aren't really bears, they are in the racoon family.
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: Spocker at 2008-05-06 19:40:51 | reply to this

Actually they're not, they're in the bear family (Ursidae)... just like other bears.
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: bob1 at 2008-05-06 19:53:52 | reply to this

Perhaps you're thinking of the RED panda, Spocker? THAT is not a member of the bear family.
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: Zumi at 2008-05-07 01:39:24 | reply to this

Still not a member of the raccoon family though :P
0 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: bob1 at 2008-05-07 02:10:43 | reply to this

Um, yes, yes it IS a member of the racoon family. Red pandas, racoons, skunks and weasles are ALL members of the same "family.
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: Zumi at 2008-05-07 02:28:20 | reply to this

I should clarify - they are *closely related to* the racoon family, not literally members of the racoon family, and are indeed NOT at all bears.
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: Zumi at 2008-05-07 02:32:37 | reply to this

Right. But they are not in the same family. Weasels, racoons, skunks, and red pandas are ALL in separate families (mustelidae, procyonidae, mephitidae, and ailuridae respectively). However, they ARE all in the same superfamily (Musteloidea).
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: bob1 at 2008-05-07 05:48:33 | reply to this

I don't know how much of this I can bear...
5 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: patito at 2008-05-07 02:34:26 | reply to this

Grrrr... Patito, 'your scene' is just a bad pun!
0 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: Just Sayin at 2008-05-07 06:44:09 | reply to this

Brilliant idea.
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: dollen at 2008-05-07 05:30:41 | reply to this

If this is so clever, why not make it an air dryer and save some paper?
3 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: ElMeanYo at 2008-05-07 15:57:24 | reply to this

aahha nice
0 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: Alexisr at 2008-05-21 03:05:36 | reply to this

IIRC 100% of American paper comes from paper tree farms making paper production 100% renewable and having nothing to do with deforesting South America or anywhere. I'm pretty sure deforesting in South America is mainly to develop farmland. It makes you think why the WWF wouldn't know that.
-2 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: bk at 2008-05-21 03:22:13 | reply to this

the paper is green, so maybe it is recycled paper or something. Just throwing that out there... green is being used more to symbolize environmentally friendly products. Anyway, I beleive it is still successful in getting its point across, whether or not it can be applied strictly in this country, or anywhere around the world. I think it is a very clever idea.
2 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: someone at 2008-06-10 20:03:25 | reply to this

Now this is a great though provoking image. Kudos to the creativity guy/girl who came up with this one.
1 vote(s) | rate comment: | written by: otheradam at 2008-07-08 12:44:35 | reply to this

name:
(required)

password:
(leave blank if not registered)

Your opinion:


enter only red symbols: