Express your nature.

Upload, Share, and Be Recognized.

Join with Facebook
or join manually

Old Comments:

2010-07-22 03:40:33
Yeah, maybe a pedophile?
2010-07-21 18:56:23
I agree with Kodak Jack. And the person who posts them is revealing a little something of himself.
2010-07-21 13:06:45
of course they are disturbing, uncle creepy and pedobear approves them!
2010-07-21 12:01:53
I agree - they are disturbing.
2010-07-21 11:38:32
Am I the only one who finds these photos slightly disturbing ? This is a beautiful child, but the shots are glamour shots, not 'little girl' shots. She looks to be about twelve years old, and there's a whiff of something a tad unsavory about sexualizing girls this age, as these shots seem to do.