Express your nature.

Upload, Share, and Be Recognized.

Join with Facebook
or join manually

Old Comments:

2010-07-19 16:21:16
Thank you FBO!
2010-07-19 16:20:45
Thank you Skip. FBO has now seen it and commented below!
2010-07-19 16:19:36
I thank all of you that have voted for this photo. Over the past 24 hours the vote total has climbed from +7 all of the way to +48, which is a lot more than I would have ever expected. The vote total is really not a concern, but it is very nice to know that my efforts in uploading are at least appreciated by some!
2010-07-19 08:58:24
We all repost at some time or other in error, with some reposting without searching at all or even on purpose - that's not you. So, ignore the 'one-comment wonder'.
2010-07-19 07:03:35
He paints reflections of the moon on water that look just like this photo. Try a google image search for "Edvard Munch moon" and you'll see what I mean :) Sorry for the abrupt first comment - wretched captcha keeps tripping me up!
2010-07-19 06:59:07
torrence is fifteen years old. when school lets out for the summer there is always a spike in inane comments.
2010-07-19 05:52:25
Fabulous Blue Evening!!!!
2010-07-18 18:06:28
Torrence, I am not sure what you mean by your statement that "most of what I post ....... was already posted anyway." I have posted 78 pictures and, to the best of my knowledge, only 3 have been reposts. I really think that this is better than the average. It seems that some of the "top" users have reputations for reposting and even for deliberate reposting. But I cannot attest to any of this. Reposting is regrettable, but I wouldn't regard it as the crime of the century. One of my reposts was pointed out to me by Connie, who posted the original. I thanked her for this, it was not something that I could have caught myself. Nobody else has pointed any out to me. One of them was a very early post of mine and I simply didn't check it out. The third was quite a bit more recent and I am entirely to blame for it. Still..... It takes quite a bit of time to analyze a photo and be certain that it has not been uploaded before. Especially if the original uploader did not tag properly and/or had spelling errors. I frankly do not have the time to spend in doing a thorough search for this as it would take hours per photo. If this is expected of me, I simply will no longer post.
2010-07-18 15:47:05
I am always happy to receive constructive criticism, torrence, but when you comment with a brand new pseudonym I am not sure whether it is intended as constructive criticism or whether you are fulfilling a personal agenda. Torrence is a brand new user name that has never commented before and that has never voted or posted a photo either. Since you do seem to possess a little knowledge about Pixdaus, I must assume that you have another user name that would be better known.
2010-07-18 15:35:08
I am sorry, CrystalM, but I can figure no connection with your comment. Outside of the name of a Norwegian painter that died in 1944, the name Edvard Munch is meaningless to me. Could you please explain?
2010-07-18 07:03:25
Edvard Munch
2010-07-18 04:24:21
not surprising, most of what you post are not nice pics and they were already posted anyways, but you still get lots of votes.
2010-07-18 03:16:42
Beautiful blues,...has FBO seen this yet? :)
2010-07-17 18:10:19
The downvoting on Pixdaus simply does not make sense to me. It should be eliminated. This photo was uploaded a short while ago and was quickly voted up to +14 and then, all of a sudden, it got struck with massive down-voting that has taken it down to +7 (a drop of seven points) and I simply cannot understand why. For a photo that initially received favourable votes to suddenly get downvoted by votes that required at least 3 people (if two of them were premium users).