Express your nature.

Upload, Share, and Be Recognized.

Join with Facebook
or join manually

Old Comments:

2011-09-01 15:23:27
It must be very comforting to be so holy and pure of spirit that one is certain of God's thoughts, His will, and His judgement of others.
2011-09-01 15:12:35
Verdict just made a good point which I'd like to reiterate. There are a few people here who, like Verdict, regardless of any actual facts or evidence, and based soley on a hunch or suspicion, form solid conclusions about the identities of those who post pics and comments. A hunch or a suspicion or a "could be" is NOT the same as evidence, circumstanntial or otherwise. In actual fact, that kind of "evidence" would be laughed out of any court in the free world. You couldn't even get an indictment with that kind of so-called evidence, much less a conviction in court. This spring and summer my wife and I were gone traveling abroad for almost 3 months, during which time I posted neither photos nor comments. Not a single one . Yet, when I got on a hotel lobby computer and checked on Pixdaus scarcely a day went by when someone wasn't absolutely certain that I was the author of a comment or the one who had posted a photo. That behavior continues...I did NOT post the comments at F.U, nor would I have had any reason to. The whole business is just ridiculous.
2011-09-01 11:03:51
Circumstantial evidence which, having been created by someone other than Patito, should not be ascribed to Patito.
2011-09-01 07:32:21
Everytime you see a brand new user posting for the first time and using a "cutsy" name like "Lepi Doptera", it is a pretty good bet that patito is behind it. Then when the up load receives an almost immediate +20 vote upgrade, you can be almost certain that patito is behind it. However, the real clincher is when patito makes an inane comment as "yes and no" followed by typical patito vulgarities as "fuck you", and finally resorting to comments in his more usual name. Of course patito is going to be quick to say that there is no proof of this. However, the circumstantial evidence is so great that he would be convicted guilty in any court of law anyplace on this planet.
2011-09-01 07:22:38
I would like to have fun Patito, just as long as I do the right thing for myself and for others..... :)
2011-09-01 07:08:58
But there is no god, anywhere, that is about to forgive patito.
2011-09-01 06:05:41
Well, nobody can make everybody happy all the time, right ? Have fun, PG...that's what we're here for : )
2011-09-01 05:28:55
Sorry. I can't understand why our comments go under the wrong comment.... :(
2011-09-01 05:28:05
Actually Patito, I find what you said in the place of that, also rude. Sorry about that....
2011-09-01 02:48:19
It's okay. God will forgive you : )
2011-09-01 02:34:19
I can't, I'm a Christian and it's a sin to do that
2011-09-01 02:32:33
Actually, the expression is 'the pot calling the kettle black.' Go have sexual intercourse with yourself ! : )
2011-09-01 02:29:43
Patito, you are the kettle calling the pot black
2011-09-01 02:16:08
PG is right, FU. Instead of being so crude you could say "Have sexual intercourse with yourself," or "Have carnal knowledge of yourself," or maybe "Make the Beast with Two Backs with yourself." That would get your point across but be a lot nicer and spare the feelings of those of more refined sensibilities.
2011-09-01 00:37:07
I find your username and comments very rude, FU. Do you think you can tone it down a little please ?
2011-08-31 23:36:30
Fuck You Too
2011-08-31 23:35:58
Fuck You
2011-08-31 23:29:54
you're an idiot!
2011-08-31 23:22:03
Please ignore one of the duplicates - this one is rude. From I saw it was posted by zogekdeze. A search on Pixdaus of 'atlas moth', it showed it was also posted by danif - the very first picture on the page. A one minute search in both cases.
2011-08-31 21:53:36
Well, there are plenty of obsessed maniacs here at Pixdaus, as is clearly evidenced by the comments on this page : )
2011-08-31 21:35:18
stop lying!!!!! under the word 'moth', FIRST page:
2011-08-31 21:18:04
This photo was posted before, but it was too large for the frame and the right side of it was chopped off, so this is the first time the photo in its entirety has been properly posted. Now that this vitally important matter has been disposed of we may return our consideration to less weighty affairs such as world peace, mass starvation and global warming.
2011-08-31 20:59:09
No it wasn't, or if it was it was not properly identified. I just searched the archives under 'Atlas Moth' and this photo did not come up. I entered 'moth' in the archives search bar and got over 50 pages, many of them with the word 'mother' in them. Only an obsessed maniac would spend all day looking through those pages.
2011-08-31 20:48:32
previously posted by zogekdeze